Wednesday, February 29, 2012

TED 2012: UPenn Flying Robots Play a Mean Keyboard

TED 2012: UPenn Flying Robots Play a Mean Keyboard:

Photo courtesy of Vijay Kumar.


LONG BEACH, Calif. — Some of the biggest leaps in aerial mechanics at the University of Pennsylvania have come straight out of professor Vijay Kumar’s mechanical engineering lab. The small, unmanned aircraft developed by Kumar and his team are just eight inches in diameter and weigh in at a little over a tenth of a pound. Four rotors surround a central processor that guides the pitch, yaw and direction of the small quadricopters, which can be manned remotely.


Kumar foresees multiple applications for his tiny craft, including building structures through coordinated efforts: An algorithm can explicitly tell the robots which parts of a structure to pick up, where to place them down, and when to do so. And just like the collective intelligence of an ant colony carrying food to the hive, Kumar’s robots can autonomously coordinate their positions across a group of machines without the aid of any central coordinator — all by sensing the positions of nearby craft, adjusting, and moving accordingly.


As you can imagine, the implications of the project’s application are widespread. In architectural applications alone — from simple construction to navigating buildings remotely — the possibilites are limitless.


But these are humdrum next to the robots’ fantastic performance of the James Bond theme across multiple instruments — as seen below — programmed and coordinated by two of Kumar’s top PhD candidates.


read more "TED 2012: UPenn Flying Robots Play a Mean Keyboard"

Video: NASA's Methane-Powered Launcher Lifts Off With a Blue-Hot Column of Flame

Video: NASA's Methane-Powered Launcher Lifts Off With a Blue-Hot Column of Flame:
Project Morpheus Launch Project Morpheus hot fire #5 was successful earlier this week. NASA

NASA's Project M, an awesome concept to use vertical launch systems to send robonauts to the moon, is still moving forward despite Robonaut's one-way trip to the International Space Station. It's now called Project Morpheus, and it's a test bed for autonomous, environmentally friendly vertical launch systems. Watch below as Morpheus fires its new engine for the first time.


The spacecraft is capable of carrying 1,100 pounds of cargo to the moon, possibly a robonaut, a rover or a moon-dust lab, according to its designers at NASA's Johnson Space Center. And it can do it all autonomously.


The best part is its propulsion system, which is fueled by methane and liquid oxygen. Methane is a waste gas on the ISS and could also conceivably be harvested from ice in lunar craters or at the Martian poles. So it would be cheap to fill up small launchers like Morpheus for sample-return trips, something this country has never done before. It could be configured to land on an asteroid, too.


Engineers at Armadillo Aerospace, which aims to send up its own vertical takeoff rockets, built the prototype according to NASA designs. The team tried out its new engine for the first time Monday, with Morpheus tethered to a tower so it couldn't take off on its own. This is the fifth "hot fire" test, but the first with this engine.


In the face of painful budget cuts, it's nice to see new launchers like this are still in NASA's future. Here's hoping Morpheus brings some robonauts to the moon after all.



[via IEEE Spectrum]


read more "Video: NASA's Methane-Powered Launcher Lifts Off With a Blue-Hot Column of Flame"

Lytro Light-Field Camera Review: Shoot, Then Focus

Lytro Light-Field Camera Review: Shoot, Then Focus:
Lytro and Buildings John Mahoney
Lytro's promise of post-shot refocusing is unlike anything we've ever seen--but does it live up to expectations?

To win our Innovation of the Year award, the Lytro had to captivate us enough for us to pass over significant medical diagnostic breakthroughs and a complete reinvention of the internal combustion engine--and it did. So we're naturally excited about the opportunity to spend a little QT with the Light-Field camera. The Lytro, which is culmination of over a decade of work by CEO Ren Ng in the world of light-field photography, is the first camera that allows its user to refocus an image after it's taken. It sounds unbelievable, but after taking our own pics with the Lytro (below), we're happy to report that it's reality.




Click to launch a gallery of Lytro-taken shots, as well as a tour of the camera's hardware.


So, a quick refresher on what exactly this light-field stuff is all about: Typical digital cameras align a lens in front of an image sensor, which captures the picture. The Lytro adds an intermediate step, an array of micro-lenses between the primary lens and the image sensor. That array fractures the light that passes through the lens into thousands of discrete light paths, which the sensor and internal processor save as a single .LPF (light-field picture) file. Your standard digital image is composed from pixel data, like color and sharpness, but pixels in a light-field picture add directional information to that mix. When a user decides where in the picture the focus should be, the image is created pixel-by-pixel from either the camera's internal processor and software or a desktop app.


Given its fundamentally different way of dealing with imagery, the Lytro specs out differently than any other digital camera. Worrying to those who have to create spec lists is the lack of a true megapixel count or relatable sensor specs. Its sensor is physically slightly smaller than your everyday point-and-shoot, but it's designed to capture more data. The Lytro's sensor captures 11 megarays of data ("megarays" refers to the number of light paths the sensor captures), which, if flattened into a simple JPEG--removing the ability to refocus the image--results in a three-megapixel image. That sounds low, but remember that the megapixel count refers only to the size of the photo, not to its quality. The only manual control left to the user is exposure--you can't actually set it, but you can tap on the screen to tell the Lytro where in the image you'd like it to base its exposure.



Handling the Lytro is also unlike anything you're likely to have used before. Users frame shots by holding the 4.4-inch-long device like a pirate looking through a spyglass, staring down the barrel through a 1.5-inch touchscreen/viewfinder on the rear (more on this in the gallery). The front two-thirds of the camera is an f/2 optical zoom lens (it zooms up to 8x) encased in aluminum, while all the controls that aren't touchscreen-based--shutter, capacitive zoom slider, and power button--are situated on the rubberized grip. Cameras come with either 8 or 16 GB of internal storage, which give you space for 350 or 750 images, respectively (if you're nit-picking the math on that one, the difference is due to the software/OS taking up precious storage). The camera feels great: solid but not heavy, with a thoughtful, modern design. The magnetic lens cover is a particularly nice touch.


Smartphone or iPod touch users will have no issue navigating on the Lytro, which is very responsive. In live-view, they access a pop-up menu by pulling up from the bottom of the screen. To scroll through previous shots, swipe from left to right as on an iDevice. In playback mode, they can "star" images as favorites, which gives those images priority when syncing with a computer later.


When we set out to shoot with the Lytro for the first time, it was immediately clear that, as we've said before, this is an entirely new type of digital photography. And, as with anything that's truly completely new, the Lytro comes with a rather steep learning curve. Our "see the picture, take the picture" mentality for point-and-shoot cameras needed some rewiring. The trick with the Lytro is to internalize where it's likely to perceive different focal planes; images with a clear fore- middle- and background separated by several feet provide the clearest examples of what light-field photography can do.



Once you get the swing of it, the Lytro does exactly what it claims to do. On every photo we took, we could change the focal point with a click -- but keep in mind that there are shades of gray involved here. Often, when subjects were grouped closely, the shift in focus from point to point was nearly imperceptible. This is how the Lytro acts by default in "everyday mode," which limits zoom to 3.5x and has a minimum focusing distance of about 5 inches. Everyday mode is ideal for images where the primary subject and secondary one are far from both the lens and one another, much like our little squirrel friend and his faraway observer.


To provide more control, Lytro has added what it calls "creative mode," which allows the users to cheat the optics to make clear distinctions between focal planes. This mode extends the camera's zoom range up to its maximum 8x and brings its minimum focusing distance down to nil. Before taking the shot, tap the screen where you want the Lytro to think of as the "middle" of your image from front-to-back, almost like on a tap-to-focus smartphone. Doing so forces the camera (quite literally, in fact; there is an audible mechanical noise inside the lens casing when you select a new midpoint) to perceive that plane as the center of its focal range and assess other planes in front of and behind it more clearly.


We had the most luck using creative mode for macro shots, like groups of balls on a coffee table. But it's also useful to separate objects that are close to one another in the foreground, while still keeping a distinctive background.



If you're running on a Mac, uploading pics from the Lytro is a true plug-and-play experience. (A Windows client is coming soon.) When you plug the camera in over USB for the first time, it automatically launches an installer for its desktop software. The camera then begins transferring images to the computer - your starred favorites go first, then the rest of the lot. This can take a while, a long while. Because each image file contains thousands of light paths, one file can bloat up to 12MB. From there, you can upload the full clickable image to Lytro.com or Facebook, or export a still JPEG with the point of focus you want selected. Should you wish to print those image, Lytro recommends you not go any larger than a 5-by-7 equivalent.


Right now the Lytro is essentially a one-trick pony, but let's not forget that it's quite the trick. Think of it this way: this camera captures multiple depths of field with one shutter click, a feat only possible previously with either a whole room filled with lenses or taking multiple versions of the same image with a regular camera. We'd love to be able to say that the final images it creates are flawless, but that's sadly not the case; in low-light there's a noticeable amount of noise--especially at high ISOs. Image blur is a real issue, as well; the slightest shake of the hand or sudden movement from the subject renders shots irretrievably blurry.


As Lytro continues to refine its image-processing engine, you'll be able to edit images to be entirely in focus or choose two distinctive light paths in order to create a 3-D effect without a dedicated 3-D camera. But the promise of light-field photography for the everyday Joe isn't limited to this one device; should the Lytro's capabilities be merged with other now-common features (adjusting ISO, exposure, white balance, and the like), it could fundamentally change how we think about a large portion of modern photography. A light-field engine on a smartphone, for instance, could remove much of the guess-work from on-the-fly shots and allow those pics to have depth previously reserved for today's DSLRs and interchangeable-lens cameras.


The Lytro light-field camera is available now for $400-$500.


Embedded interactive images taken by Corinne Iozzio. For an assessment of the Lytro from a photographer's point of view, check out Popular Photography's take.


read more "Lytro Light-Field Camera Review: Shoot, Then Focus"

Air Force Swears: Our Next Bomber Isn’t Too Big To Fail

Air Force Swears: Our Next Bomber Isn’t Too Big To Fail:

A B-1 bomber lands at Nellis Air Force Base, Nev. Photo: U.S. Air Force


The Air Force is good at destroying targets half a world away, spying on people for a long period of time and hauling goods vast distances. It’s really, really bad at keeping its planes affordable. Unless that changes, the Air Force’s top officer acknowledges, the Air Force will lose its premiere, desired asset for destroying targets half a world away: its bomber of the future.


That new bomber, the Air Force says, should cost $550 million per plane. It’ll be stealthy, capable of carrying nuclear weapons, and half robot — that is, it’ll only be “optionally manned” by a human pilot. Creating it as a replacement for the ancient B-1 and B-2 bombers is one of the Air Force’s top priorities over the next decade.


But if the “Long Range Strike Aircraft” costs more than that $550 million estimate, “We don’t get a program,” lamented Gen. Norton Schwartz.


“That was the guidance of the secretary of defense,” Schwartz, the Air Force’s chief of staff, told reporters during a Wednesday roundtable. “Either deliver or, you know, you’re outta there, essentially, was Bob Gates’ guidance. I get it. Loud and clear.”



Then the Air Force may have to consider the possibility that it may not get a long-range bomber program. Its record of controlling the costs of its aircraft flat-out sucks. Most importantly, the Air Force tried to build a new bomber during the last decade — until Gates killed it, partially out of fear of skyrocketing costs.


The Air Force’s favorite dogfighter, the F-22, got so expensive Gates had to cap that as well. The next-generation stealth fighter, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter family of jets, is already history’s most expensive weapons system, and a host of design flaws might jack up the cost of the trillion-dollar plane even more.


Nor is the acquisition failure limited to the Air Force’s top priorities. On Tuesday, the service abruptly canceled a contract, for unclear reasons, to send a light attack aircraft to Afghanistan’s nascent air force — something Schwartz called a “profound disappointment.”


But Schwartz didn’t actually explain how the Air Force would keep the costs of the next-next-generation bomber. The capabilities the service wants it to possess are considerable: jamming enemy radars, shooting off lasers to burn incoming missiles, and controlling a fleet of drones. Oh, and bombing stuff.


Schwartz’s argument, in brief, is that the Air Force needs a new bomber by the mid-2020s, so it just has to find a way to make it work. If it doesn’t, the U.S. can kiss its long-range strike skills goodbye.


“Do you think that the Chinese have established one of the world’s best air defense environments, in their eastern provinces, just to invest their national treasure? Or for that matter, that the Iranians have established integrated air defenses in their country?” Schwartz said, when Danger Room asked why the Air Force even needs a new bomber. “I would say they’re not doing this, you know, for the fun of it. They’re doing this because they have a sense of vulnerability. And I ask you, what is it that conveys this sense of vulnerability to others? One of those things is long-range strike. And that is an asset that the United States of America should not concede.”

read more "Air Force Swears: Our Next Bomber Isn’t Too Big To Fail"

Photos and Info: Boeing Delivers Their First 747-8 Intercontinental

Photos and Info: Boeing Delivers Their First 747-8 Intercontinental:
The first Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental to be delivered (A7-HHE) lines up on 16R at Paine Field.

The first Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental to be delivered (A7-HHE) lines up on 16R at Paine Field.


Yesterday, Boeing delivered their first 747-8 Intercontinental. Although we know that the customer is the government of Qatar, Boeing was tight-lipped about who the customer might be.


Other than the registration number and information from reliable sources, there has been no official confirmation from either Boeing or the government of Qatar. Boeing stated that they are following the wishes of their customer and not publicly confirming or denying if it is the government of Qatar.


Boeing Executives answer questions about the Boeing 747-8I program before take off.

Boeing Executives answer questions about the Boeing 747-8I program before take off.


Before the delivery flight, Boeing held a press conference to answer questions about the 747-8 program. Present were Bruce Dickinson, VP and Chief Project Engineer, 747-8 Program, Elizabeth Lund, Vice President, 747 Program, Captain Steve Taylor, President of Boeing Business Jets (BBJ) and Jim Proulx, Boeing 747 Communications.


When asked if the Intercontinental might participate in a world tour, like the 787 Dreamliner, Lund explained that they are in discussion about the possibly and would prefer to work with an airline customer, like Lufthansa.


How would you like a bed in the nose of a Boeing 747-8I?

How would you like a bed in the nose of a Boeing 747-8I? Photo showing potential 747-8I BBJ interior from Boeing.


Currently there are nine 747-8 VIPs on order and Taylor stated that it is safe to say that all of them are going to government customers.


One government customer who does not have a 747-8I on order yet is the President of the United States. Lund stated that Boeing has spoken to the president and assured him that Boeing is more than ready to build the next Air Force One.


You have to love the extended upper deck of the 747-8 Intercontinental.

You have to love the extended upper deck of the 747-8 Intercontinental.


The first Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental that will go into commercial service with Lufthansa is still going through its final testing phase, which should be completed in the next week. Since the passenger version has things like seats, in-flight entertainment and more, it needs the additional time before being ready for delivery.


Lund stated that Boeing is working to get an official delivery date for the aircraft to Lufthansa and they hope to announce that date in the next few weeks. Previously, they have stated that they hope to deliver the first passenger Intercontinental in March of this year.


This is a mock up of a possible interior of a Boeing Business Jet 747-8I. The one delivered yesterday was empty. Photo by Boeing.

This is a mock up of a possible interior of a Boeing Business Jet 747-8I. The one delivered yesterday was empty. Photo by Boeing.


Near the end of the press conference, BBJ President Steven Taylor had to politely leave, since not only does he oversee the BBJ program, but he is also a pilot, that is rated to fly the 747-8I and he was going to be flying during the delivery flight. How cool is that?


After the press conference, it was time to head to the Future of Flight’s strato deck to wait for the the 747-8I to take off. Luckily it was not raining, but it was windy and very cold. Unfortunately, the aircraft was late taking off, so by the time she taxied out and lined up, my hands were having a hard time taking photos due to frozen fingers.


It was disappointing that we were not able to tour the interior of the aircraft and it was also not parked next to the Future of Flight where we could get better photos from the tarmac. But it is still not a bad thing to gather with aviation media to watch the first 747-8I to be delivered.


And lift off. The Boeing 747-8I heads off to Vancouver.

And lift off. The Boeing 747-8I heads off to Vancouver.


At about 1:01pm, the 747-8I lifted off from Paine Field, with cheers from the Boeing and media folks that gathered to watch.


First, the 747-8I flew to Vancouver for a few hours to complete customs paperwork before heading to Wichita, Kansas to begin its two year interior installation. There, the Aeroloft, which is a sleeping berth in the rear of the aircraft, will be installed before heading to Lufthansa Technik in Hamburg, Germany for the rest of the interior installation.


Once completed in 2014, the aircraft will be able to carry 100 passengers in style, up to 8,840 nautical miles.

read more "Photos and Info: Boeing Delivers Their First 747-8 Intercontinental"

No Pulse: How Doctors Reinvented The Human Heart

No Pulse: How Doctors Reinvented The Human Heart:
Artificial Heart Jack Thompson
This 10,000-rpm, no-pulse artificial heart doesn't resemble an organic heart--and might be all the better for it

Meeko the calf stood nuzzling a pile of hay. He didn't seem to have much appetite, and he looked a little bored. Every now and then, he glanced up, as though wondering why so many people with clipboards were standing around watching him.


Fourteen hours earlier, I'd watched doctors lift Meeko's heart from his body and place it, still beating, in a plastic dish. He looked no worse for the experience, whisking away a fly with his tail as he nibbled, demonstrably alive-though above his head, a monitor showed a flatlined pulse. I held a stethoscope to his warm, fragrant flank and heard, instead of the deep lub-dub of a heartbeat, what sounded like a dentist's drill or the underwater whine of an outboard motor. Something was keeping Meeko alive, but it was nothing like a heart.


As many as five million Americans suffer some form of heart failure, but only about 2,000 hearts a year become available for transplant. The obvious solution to that scarcity is to build an artificial heart, and how hard could that be? The heart's just a pump, after all, and people have been making pumps since the Mesopotamians invented the shadoof to raise river water 3,000 years before the birth of Christ. Doctors started thinking seriously about replacing the heart with a machine around the time Harry Truman was president.


To understand why they still haven't succeeded, pick up a two-pound barbell and start curling it. Two pounds: nothing. But see how long you can keep it up. Twenty minutes? An hour? Two? Your heart does that all day and all night-35 million beats a year-for as long as you live, without ever taking a rest. Manufacturing a metal and plastic heart capable of beating that way for more than about 18 months has so far proved impossible.


The problem is the "beating" part. Among the first to envision an artificial heart was, amazingly, the ventriloquist Paul Winchell. When not in front of a TV camera manipulating his dummies Jerry Mahoney and Knucklehead Smiff, Winchell was developing patents, some 30 in all, including one for an artificial heart that he invented with Dr. Henry Heimlich, of the eponymous anti-choking maneuver. Back then, and up through the famous Jarvik-7-the first machine to replace a human heart, in 1982, albeit briefly-inventors could only imagine imitating the heart's lub-dub. That is, they envisioned filling a chamber with deoxygenated blood returning from the body and pumping it out to the lungs to be infused with oxygen-lub-and then drawing that good red blood back into a second chamber and pumping it back out to the body-dub.


It turns out that imitating a beating heart with metal and plastic has several limitations. First, the Jarvik-7 and its successors that are still in use require an air compressor outside the body. Through hoses that pierce the skin, the compressor fills a balloon inside one of the Jarvik's chambers, pushing blood to the lungs. Then it fills a second balloon in another chamber to push blood back out to the body. The two balloons inflate and deflate in an alternating rhythm. It works, but it also means that a patient has to sit beside a big, noisy compressor 24 hours a day. That's better than dying of heart failure, but it doesn't make for a great quality of life. Barney Clark, the first person to live entirely on a Jarvik-7, asked his doctors several times, during his 112 days on the device, to let him die.



Clark probably would not have been able to hang on much longer in any case. Those balloons, and all other moving parts in a beating mechanical heart, wear out quickly. That's why, almost 30 years after the first Jarvik-7, artificial hearts remain what is delicately termed "bridges to transplant"-something to keep you alive until a real heart can be found.


A transplantable heart, alas, is an increasingly rare find. It has to come from a person who is in the blush of good health and also, somehow, dead. As cars have gotten safer and states have passed laws requiring seatbelts and motorcycle helmets, the number of such hearts has dwindled. The need for hearts, on the other hand, has grown with the world's population and the conquering of other diseases. And even when a heart is found, patients face the risk of tissue rejection.


Building a heart that mimics nature's lub-dub may be as comically shortsighted as Leonardo da Vinci designing a flying machine with flapping wings. Nature is not always the best designer, at least when it comes to things that humans must build and maintain. So the newest artificial heart doesn't imitate the cardiac muscle at all. Instead, it whirs like a little propeller, pushing blood through the body at a steady rate. After 500 million years of evolution accustoming the human body to blood moving through us in spurts, a pulse may not be necessary. That, in any case, is the point of view of the 50-odd calves, and no fewer than three human beings, who have gotten along just fine with their blood coursing through them as evenly as Freon through an air conditioner.


"His giant heartbeat," Rainer Maria Rilke wrote of God early in the past century, "is diverted in us into little pulses." Nowadays, maybe not.


Click here to view this article on a single page, or continue to page two below.





The Texas Medical Center is a city within a city. Its 13 hospitals and 21 schools cover a swath of Houston bigger than New York's Central Park. Navigating its raised sidewalks, light rail and glass towers feels like getting lost on a set for The Jetsons. One hundred thousand people work and study here every day. The place has its own zip code.


Among the towers is the Texas Heart Institute, in which I found Dr. Billy Cohn, a big, fit man in his early 50s with light hair, blue eyes, and an office that would no doubt have exasperated his mother. It looked like the mad scientists' club at a middle school, every surface covered with sketches, tools, bits of machined metal, wire, statuettes, playing cards and such toys as a Darwinian evolution action-figure set (horseshoe crab, various monkeys and a gray-bearded intellectual). A static-electricity generator flashed lightning bolts, and a three-dimensional model of the human heart loomed over Cohn's desk. Even his file cabinet looked weird, pimpled with tiny bits of metal.


"Rare-earth magnets!" Cohn cried, straining to pull one free. He put it in my hand. It was the size of a pencil eraser, and when I loosened my grip, it shot like a bullet to the file cabinet with a clang. "Extremely powerful." Cohn has pioneered the use of rare-earth magnets to move catheters into place deep inside the body. He avoids having to cut patients open by threading the magnets, and their tiny loads, up through arteries. He pawed several sheets of paper off the floor and drew diagrams on their unused backs, launching an hour-long discourse on the instruments and procedures he's built around miniature magnets.


Building a heart that mimics nature's lub-dub may be as comically shortsighted as Leonardo Da Vinci designing a flying machine with flapping wings.On his wall hung four metal serving spoons of the kind you might see on a cafeteria line. One was intact; the other three had intricate slots cut in them. Years ago, Cohn butchered the spoons in his home garage to solve the problem of holding a heart still while operating on it. The standard way, at the time, was to shut off the heart altogether and put the patient on a heart-lung machine. But that was risky. Cohn's spoons let surgeons hold a heart in place while still giving them access to the parts they needed to slice or stitch. Through the custom-cut slots, the surface of the heart would emerge and hold still for tinkering, even while the rest of the heart thrashed around under the spoon. Cohn refined the idea and sold it to a medical-devices company, which has marketed the tools worldwide.


Cohn grew up building rockets in the garage with his older brother John, and neither of them ever quite outgrew it. (John is one of 80 IBM fellows, the company's highest technical rank.) "That there?" Billy Cohn said, pointing to what I'd thought was a scuba diver's speargun. It hung on the wall beside laminated newspaper clippings about him. "I invented that out of old parts in the garage. It puts a bag, like a big sock, all the way around the heart." He spent 20 breathless minutes describing why a surgeon would want to do such a thing.


It's the continuous-flow artificial heart Cohn installed in the chest of Meeko the calf, though, that enthralls him now. Using such turbines to assist sick hearts has been standard practice since the mid-1990s. But along with his research partner, Dr. O.H. "Bud" Frazier, Cohn is experimenting with using them to replace the heart entirely-and doing so with the hands-on ingenuity of the professor on Gilligan's Island. He rummaged through the detritus on his desk and placed in my hands two gray metal cylinders-turbines, each the size and shape of a saltshaker-connected to each other by white tubing. Also attached to each was a white cone made of a spongy rubberized cloth.


"Dacron polyester," he said. Because the cones are what get sewn to the remainder of the heart's atria, their design was tricky. He ticked off the concerns on his long fingers. "The materials needed to be blood-friendly. The structure needed to be resilient to deformation. It had to be formable in a limited space. We needed to be able to sew it, but the needle holes couldn't let blood leak. And we had to be able to customize it in the OR by cutting it. I bought some ordinary Dacron from the fabric store and RTV silicone from Home Depot to impregnate the outside. I did all this in my garage. My wife calls them dolly dresses."


The continuous-flow heart solves the biggest problem with artificial hearts: longevity. One little turbine like the ones Cohn showed me has been running continuously in a lab for eight years and shows no sign of wearing out. Another advantage is that it runs on a battery no bigger than a videocassette. The patient can wear it in a kind of shoulder holster-cumbersome, but not as bad as sitting day and night beside a hissing compressor the size of a dishwasher.


It all made sense in theory, sitting in Billy Cohn's office. But the whole idea of life without a pulse was a little too weird for me to grasp. It seemed like some sort of parlor trick. How could someone be alive without exhibiting the most fundamental sign of life? And how did anybody even dream up such a thing?



The dire need for a practical artificial heart hit Bud Frazier like a thunderclap one awful night in the 1960s. An eager medical student, Frazier had watched the legendary heart surgeon Michael DeBakey open the chest of a 24-year-old man and install a new heart valve. Later that night, the man's heart stopped. It was up to Frazier to reach in, grab the warm but flaccid heart, and massage it with his hand to keep the blood pumping. As long as Frazier kept opening and closing his hand around the man's heart, the man stayed alive. And Frazier was highly motivated to continue. The man's eyes were open and looking right at him.


Today, Frazier is a white-haired eminence at the Texas Heart Institute, as calm, soft-spoken and slow-moving as his partner Cohn is loud and speedy. "DeBakey finally told me ‘Stop,' " Frazier recalled. " ‘We can't save him.' The chief resident said the same thing; told me to quit. I didn't want to stop. I had the boy's eyes right on mine. Finally, I stopped, and he died. I thought, ‘My god, if I can do that with my hand, we must be able to develop something we can pull off a shelf.' "


For Richard Wampler, the road to the continuous-flow heart began in 1976 in the Egyptian village of El Bayad. Wampler, a surgeon and engineer whose passion is medical devices, was in Egypt volunteering on a medical mission, watching villagers use an Archimedes' screw to pump water from a well. The screw, named for its third-century-B.C. inventor, is a simple auger in a pipe. As it turns, it lifts liquid with it. The image of that village well never left him. Less than a decade later, Wampler patented a device to move blood through the body, without a pulse, using an Archimedes' screw. ("My experience with creativity is like that," he told me on the phone. "I'll be jogging or lying in the pool, and it will come to me.")


"As long as Bud Frazier kept opening and closing his hand around the man's heart, the man stayed alive."Wampler brought a prototype of his idea to Frazier, who was by now a renowned heart surgeon. It was the early 1980s, and the hot idea in heart surgery was to install a small pump in the chest, not to replace the heart but to assist the left ventricle in pushing blood throughout the body. (The work of the right ventricle-pushing blood to the lungs to be reoxygenated-was left to the natural heart.) Used that way, the pump was called a left-ventricle assist device, or LVAD. The problem was that the patient still had to be hooked up to a cumbersome compressor, and, because the LVAD pulsed like a heart, it wore out relatively quickly. Frazier and Wampler thought the Archimedes' screw might prove to be a longer-term and more comfortable solution.


Most people in the cardiac-surgery world were skeptical. The International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation's journal turned down Frazier's paper, saying (as Frazier recalled) that this was of some interest to Dr. Frazier but of no interest to the general clinical population and will have no impact on the treatment of heart failure. Sitting in his majestic, book-lined office, Frazier flapped a hand contemptuously. "I was like Robinson Crusoe doing magic tricks for the goats."


But he'd pressed on. The most foreseeable problem with using an Archimedes' screw to move blood, in his view, was damaging the blood itself. The most a person can tolerate is one shredded cell in 200,000. The continuous-flow turbine, spinning like a blender on high speed, seemed likely to tear the red cells apart. There was only one way to find out.


Frazier began implanting continuous-flow pumps, based on the Archimedes' screw, in calves-not as complete artificial hearts, only as assists to the left ventricle. They were crude, the screw inside the animal connected by a spinning cable to a motor outside. It wouldn't be anything a human would want, but it proved that the concept could work; the turbine did no damage to the blood-perhaps, Frazier theorized, because it shot the blood cells through so fast.


While Frazier was installing left-ventricle pumps in calves, a NASA engineer named David Saucier received a heart transplant from Frazier's old mentor Dr. DeBakey. On follow-up visits to DeBakey at the Texas Heart Institute, the engineer became acquainted with Frazier's project, and it got him thinking. Years before, Saucier had worked on the space shuttle, helping to put together the pumps that fed propellant to the main engine. Perhaps there were features of the pump that could inform the design of a better blood pump, one that wouldn't need to connect to an outside motor.


Saucier got NASA to open an investigation in conjunction with Baylor College of Medicine, which is part of the Texas Medical Center. Squeezing the screw and the motor into a package small enough to fit in a person's chest proved to be a knotty problem. When it wasn't going well, one of the doctors cracked to a NASA engineer, "If you can send a man to the moon, then why can't you make a blood pump?" The engineer replied, "They gave us a hell of a lot more money to send a man to the moon."



In 1995, 11 years after Saucier started NASA's informal work on an implantable continuous-flow blood pump, some of the NASA and Baylor researchers helped create a company called MicroMed to bring the pump to market, and three years later, surgeons implanted one in a patient in Europe. (The FDA hadn't yet approved it for use in the U.S.) By now, MicroMed had competition from a company called Thoratec, which had an Archimedes'-screw continuous-flow blood pump of its own moving through the FDA approval process. Eager to stay ahead, MicroMed made the bubble-era mistake of letting itself be acquired by a hedge fund called Absolute Capital Management, which starved the project as it imploded spectacularly, its principals facing charges of fraud. Thoratec zoomed past the wreckage of MicroMed and was soon testing its own device, the HeartMate II, in clinical trials.


The HeartMate II was an Archimedes' screw with magnets implanted in the axle and an electric coil in the cylindrical case surrounding it-the saltshaker-shaped device that Cohn had placed in my hands. A charge zipped around the coil, drawing the screw along at 8,000 to 12,000 revolutions per minute. The axle spun on a synthetic-ruby bearing, lubricated by the blood itself. Connected to a portable battery, it let patients live fairly normal lives and was designed to stay in place forever, not merely as a "bridge to transplant." Patients' own hearts still worked; the continuous flow of the pump just helped things along.


And here's where the story gets spooky. In November 2003, Frazier installed the newly approved HeartMate II to assist the failing heart of a young man from Central America who barely spoke English. His family members spoke none. So none of them fully understood Frazier's instructions to return to the hospital frequently for follow-up. The young man walked out of the hospital and disappeared.


When he finally showed up eight months later, Frazier held a stethoscope to his chest and was stunned to hear no heartbeat at all. None. Even more-sensitive instruments would have found nothing resembling a pulse. The young man's heart continued to flutter weakly, but it had effectively shut down. Although the HeartMate II had been designed to assist the heart, not replace it, in this case it seemed to be doing all the work: not just helping the left ventricle push oxygenated blood to the body, but pushing the blood hard enough to flow through the body, then back through the useless heart to the lungs, through the useless heart again, and into the pump to complete the loop and begin the process all over again. The reason the young man had never come back for follow-up, he told Frazier, was that he'd felt perfectly fine.


Thoratec won FDA approval of the HeartMate II in 2008, and surgeons have now installed continuous-flow LVADs alongside the hearts of some 11,000 people worldwide (among them former vice president Dick Cheney). But cases like that of the Central American man remain extremely rare. Newspapers reported that Cheney had no pulse, but in fact he and most other recipients continue to experience, as Cohn describes it, "cyclic fluctuations of pressure with each heartbeat." Even though such fluctuations might be detectable only by an intra-arterial monitoring line hooked to a pressure transducer, they remain present. Patients walk around with videocassette-size batteries hanging under their armpits, their hearts still beating. Frazier, who invited Billy Cohn to join him at the Texas Heart Institute in 2004, has installed many LVADs. He showed me a video of one of his patients playing basketball and another participating in a hip-hop dance contest.


One of the most surprising things about the LVAD is that it does something the medical community had thought impossible: It reverses heart failure. Until the past few years, damage to the heart was thought to be permanent. But it seems that by relieving strain, an LVAD lets some hearts damaged by, for instance, heart attacks repair wall tissue and grow healthy again. Often the LVAD can be removed. "It's like putting a cast on a broken ankle," Cohn says. "You take it off when it's healed. We had no idea that could happen."


Some hearts, though, can't be healed. And for those who continue to worsen even with an LVAD, the only choices are the increasingly hard-to-come-by transplant, or replacement with a machine. The experience of Frazier's Central American patient told Frazier and Cohn that it was theoretically possible to replace hearts entirely with continuous-flow pumps. But that raised the kind of questions nobody had ever before had to consider. Our bodies have evolved to have blood move through us in pulses. Was a pulse necessary for reasons we couldn't yet imagine? One possible snag that occurred to Cohn was the lymphatic system. Unlike blood, the ducts that move lymph through the body have no motor of their own. They surround arteries and get their motion from the pulse of the blood. "It was a good theory," Cohn laughs. "So far, though, we haven't found any evidence that continuous flow creates problems with the lymph."



Cohn knows this because a few people, like Frazier's Central American patient, do continue to walk around with no pulse at all. Describing a miracle patient he wanted me to meet, Richard Wampler told me that Rahel Elmer Reger had a functionally inert "stone heart" yet was living comfortably in upstate New York. I got on a plane.


Reger was 36 years old, a mother of two- and five-year-old girls, when she finally consented to have her heart valve replaced in 2009. She'd had no symptoms, but her cardiologist said the heart murmur she'd had since childhood really should be fixed. Her aortic valve, if left untreated, could someday seal up altogether. So Reger cleared her calendar and checked into Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York, thinking she'd be laid up for seven to 10 days.


Neither she nor her doctors know exactly what went wrong, but for some reason her heart wouldn't restart after the surgery. She stayed on a heart-lung machine for an extremely damaging 14 hours. "Prepare yourself for your wife never to leave the hospital," the surgeon told her husband, Tim, adding, with all the delicacy for which heart surgeons are renowned, "Now I'm going to get some soup." By the time Tim saw his wife, in an intensive-care room so crammed with electronics that it looked like a discount store, she was being kept alive by two Thoratec CentriMags-big centrifugal pumps operating outside her body. From the looks of things, she wasn't going anywhere anytime soon.


When Reger developed dangerous clots, the surgeon disconnected the left external pump and inserted a HeartMate II into her chest. She reacted well, and eventually they also disconnected the right-side external pump. Her own heart had never restarted-it lay in her chest almost completely still-but the HeartMate II seemed to be powerful enough to move her blood throughout her body. Seventy-two days after checking in for what she thought would be a week's hospitalization, Reger went home to her daughters without a pulse.


I met her one drippy morning at her home in Clinton, a Norman Rockwell-perfect town outside Utica. Her husband is the Episcopal priest in town, and they were living in the yellow-painted rectory beside the 19th-century church. I expected Reger to look sickly, so when the door was opened by a vigorous, pink-cheeked woman of small stature yet big personality, I figured she was a nurse or a friend. Reger stood only five feet tall but had a piercing stare and a strong voice utterly unaccented by her Swiss-German childhood. She shook my hand firmly and led me inside. On her back, she wore a small quilted backpack; a cable ran from it and up her shirt.


"I remember going in and out that first day, and when Tim told me my family was coming from Switzerland, I knew it wasn't good," she said as we sat in a warm living room decorated with her daughters' artwork. She extended her wrist for me to hold. It was warm, but might otherwise have been that of a dead woman: no pulse.


Reger's heart doesn't seem to be getting better, but it could hardly get worse. Like the heart of Frazier's Central American patient, Reger's has all but given up. Logically, she should be dead. Instead, she feels fine, caring for her daughters and walking a pedometer-measured two miles a day. So far, living without a pulse has caused no problems with her lymph or anything else.


A few people continue to walk around with no pulse at all. One of them was living comfortably in upstate New YorkThe little quilted backpack held two lithium-ion batteries and the HeartMate II's computerized controller, which are connected by cable through a hole in Reger's side. Needless to say, she has never left her backpack on a bus. "My cousin once disconnected me, though, by mistake," she said. "I was showing her how to change the battery. She disconnected one, and then-I was distracted for a second-the other. I yelled, ‘You can't do that!' and then passed out. The device blares at you. She reconnected it, and I came back. I was probably out for 10 seconds. She was completely freaked out. She wanted to go right back to Switzerland."


Reger and the Central American patient proved that humans could survive, indeed thrive, with no pulse. But Frazier and Cohn were attempting to achieve intentionally what those patients had done inadvertently. Rather than augmenting an existing heart, which may lack sufficient strength and is in any case full of crannies that can grow dangerous clots, they would replace it entirely with two turbines, one to do the work of the left ventricle and one to do the work of the right.


Last March, they got their long-awaited chance. A 55-year-old man named Craig Lewis showed up at the Texas Heart Institute with a case of amyloidosis, an extremely rare and severe condition in which the body produces a rogue protein that gradually fills the organs with what Cohn calls "an insoluble muck." Lewis had slid from perfect health to death's door in less than a year.


The doctors attached him to a heart-lung machine, and another device took over the function of the kidneys. He kept going into cardiac arrest, though, and staying attached to the machines was no longer feasible in any case. "That's permissible for only five days, and he was on day 14," Cohn says. "That's when we started thinking about our device. There was no way he would have survived a heart transplant; the amyloid would have attacked it." Lewis knew he didn't have much choice and decided to give the turbine a shot. Cohn removed Lewis's diseased heart and replaced it with a pair of HeartMate IIs.


Two days after surgery, Lewis sat up in bed and spoke with his family. An aspiring engineer, he even sketched ideas for how better to hook up the heart. Cohn showed me a photo of him drawing diagrams on a pad. The patient's liver failure from the amyloidosis was so bad that within five weeks, he lost consciousness and his family asked Cohn to switch the heart off. But he'd gotten those five weeks-time to say goodbye. And he'd left a legacy. In those five weeks, Frazier and Cohn had proved that two tiny, continuous-flow turbines could replace a natural heart.





When Cohn and I entered the operating room, all we could see of Meeko was a tall mound of blue surgical drapes and a red rectangular cavern: Meeko's chest cavity. Other surgeons had prepped the calf for surgery. Cohn was stepping in, as usual, to work the final miracle.


Twenty-eight people attended-technicians running the heart-lung machine, anesthesiologists, veterinarians of various stripe, photographers and goggle-eyed medical students. Everybody was walking around and talking; it was like a big cocktail party, only the guests wore scrubs and all you could see above their masks were their eyes. Among the guests was Bryan Lynch of MicroMed, the hedge-fund-wrecked company, now risen from the dead. Lynch and a few others from the company's early days had bought their company back from the debris of Absolute Capital Management for a net outlay of $2 million-pennies on the dollar-and had a design that put the magnets in the blades of the screw instead of the axle. That shrunk the axle and made the blades bigger, which meant the screw could turn more evenly. That and a new silica-carbide bearing, Lynch hoped, would reduce the risk of creating dangerous blood clots. It was MicroMed's pumps that Cohn was preparing to implant in Meeko's chest.


Overhead, a big flat-screen TV, connected to a miniature camera on Cohn's forehead, gave us a surgeon's view of the procedure. The medical students gazed at it raptly. I didn't use it because Cohn had told me to stand at his left elbow, where I could peer straight down onto the calf's red, thrashing heart.


Working with an electric cauterizing scalpel that sizzled as it touched flesh (and sent up a distinct steakhouse aroma), Cohn peeled tissue from around the heart. The more its constraints were peeled away, the more vigorously the heart seemed to buck. "Go on!" Cohn yelled, which was the signal for the heart-lung machine to take over. A thick transparent tube filled with dark, purple blood from the calf, and another tube returned it a livid red. With a few deep, swift strokes, Cohn cut the heart free and lifted it on his palm. He left the atria of the heart-a sort of lid, where the big vein and artery go in and out-inside Meeko's chest. The rest of it continued to beat as he laid it in a basin because residues of blood remained in the small coronary arteries. Cohn cocked an eye at me over his mask. "I'll bet you're thinking, ‘How dare he.' " Actually, what I was thinking was: Thus begins my life as a vegetarian.


Working fast, Cohn sewed collars of rubberized Dacron onto the atria. His stitching looked like plain old needle-and-thread work, low-tech and almost casual in its rapidity. Within a few minutes, he had fixed in place two white, doughnut-shaped collars. He lifted the turbines from a dish of saline, their rubberized-Dacron dolly dresses dangled from them. They were marked "Not Approved for Human Use," but each was smaller than the HeartMate II, another advantage MicroMed hopes one day to exploit.


Working as deftly as ever, Cohn sewed the dolly dresses onto the collars he'd installed in the atria. There was no dramatic moment when the turbines were activated and the heart-lung machine turned off; it happened sometime during the third hour of surgery. But at one point, I noticed that the blood-pressure monitor no longer displayed two numbers-120 over 80-but one: 78. "Usually we measure blood pressure at the moment the heart squeezes and the moment it relaxes, the systolic and diastolic numbers. This calf has only one now. And check out the pulse."


Flatline. William Shakespeare, many scholars believe, wrote sonnets in iambic pentameter to imitate the sound of a human heartbeat. What, I wondered, would the Bard make of this?


Cohn kept freaking me out doing magic tricks. In the elevator on our way upstairs from the operating room, he pulled five one-dollar bills from his pocket. "Five singles, right?" he said. He turned the bills over in his hand and swiveled the palm upward with a flourish. The five ones had turned into five 100s. There was nothing up his sleeve; he still had on his short-sleeved scrubs.


Back in his office, he asked me to pick a card at random from a deck, look at it, and put it back in the deck. It was the 10 of diamonds. He told me to draw a shape in the air with my finger. I drew a triangle. "Think of a color but don't tell me what it is," he said. I thought of green. He cut the deck, and there was the 10 of diamonds, a green triangle inked on it. I almost passed out.


It wasn't until that evening, when we sat in a windowless break room drinking terrible coffee, that he revealed why he'd kept showing me magic tricks-to refute, in a way, Arthur C. Clarke's famous dictum, that advanced technology is "indistinguishable from magic." First, though, Cohn set aside his coffee and cracked his knuckles. "Now," he said in a P.T. Barnum voice, "I'll show you the amazing disappearing saltshaker. Usually I do this with a special silk, but . . ." He looked around, grabbed a stiff brown paper towel, shrugged, and wrapped the plastic shaker in it. "No, wait," he said, the smoothness of his act ruined. "This is the amazing saltshaker-through-the-table." He set the wrapped saltshaker down on the table with a loud clunk, stopped, took it away, and said, "Sorry. Maybe it'll work better with these." He put some packets of pepper on the table, thought a second, and then swept them away. Something had him rattled, I couldn't tell what. "No, it's the saltshaker. That's right." He set it up on the table again with one hand and smacked it hard with his palm. The paper towel flattened out, and we heard the saltshaker bounce off the floor below the table. I bent to retrieve it, flummoxed.


"OK," he said gently. "Let me deconstruct it for you." All those fumbling mistakes with the silk and the pepper packets were, as it turned out, part of the trick, designed to distract me from what was really going on: his molding the stiff paper towel to the saltshaker and secreting the shaker under the table. When he smacked down the towel, he released the shaker, which he'd been holding under the table. "It's all part of a script. Every word I said, every motion of my hands, had a role in making the trick work. It seemed random-even like mistakes-to you. But it was all part of the script."


He sat back and spread his hands. "That's what heart surgery is," he said with a soft laugh. "It's a script. To you, it probably looked like I was just sewing those collars into Meeko's chest any old way. But every motion was planned, tested, practiced. Turn my hand eight degrees and poke the needle through; swivel my hand back 22 degrees and draw the needle up four inches; turn my hand back just so and bring it to the left a half inch: a precise number of stitches, pulled just so tight and no tighter. What heart surgery takes is remembering an incredibly long and complicated script and following it exactly, step by step."


Walking back to his office, I pressed him on how long it would be before people were walking around with continuous-flow artificial hearts. Some people think that pressure from the medical-equipment industry makes the FDA too hasty in approving new medical devices. Others think the opposite-that pressure from the insurance industry makes the FDA drag its feet, because insurance companies don't want to pay for expensive new therapies or, god forbid, keep deathly ill people alive longer. Cohn was in neither camp. "They have a hard job to do, and we want them to be careful," he said as we sat down again amidst his playing cards and heart models. Besides, the technology really isn't ready, he said. Using two turbines, with two computerized controllers, is cumbersome. "It really needs to be one integrated unit." That will take another three or four years to develop, he estimated, and then another six or seven for the trials necessary for FDA approval. But the principle has been proven, he thinks. The delay didn't bother him; it's part of scientific advancement: "The Wright brothers flew 800 feet in 1903, and commercial air travel began in 1920."


"Oh, hey! Look at this," he suddenly cried, pawing through the mess on his desk. He came up with a small cardboard box. On the lid, he'd pasted a photograph of the continuous-flow artificial heart, and below it, the letters S, M, L and XL. He'd circled the L with a red Sharpie. "Doesn't that look cool?" he said, holding it up for me to admire. It looked like a novelty item you'd pick up at a magicians' supply store. "It's a joke," he said, "but this is kind of what I envision. That you'll be able to walk into Costco, pull this off a shelf, and have your surgeon stick it in your chest. These things are so simple, we'll be putting them in the chests of 100,000 people a year." He set down the box, picked up the turbines with their dolly dresses, and turned them over lovingly in his hands. Just as human flight wasn't possible until people gave up the idea of imitating birds, permanently replacing the most vital of organs may not be possible without ridding our minds of the heart's telltale beat. "I think we're on the verge, right now, of solving the artificial-heart problem for good," he said. "All we had to do was get rid of the pulse."


Dan Baum is the author, most recently, of the book Nine Lives:Mystery, Magic, Death and Life in New Orleans.


Check out more from our Future of Medicine issue here.


read more "No Pulse: How Doctors Reinvented The Human Heart"

1 in 8 Chance of Catastrophic Solar Megastorm by 2020

1 in 8 Chance of Catastrophic Solar Megastorm by 2020:


The Earth has a roughly 12 percent chance of experiencing an enormous megaflare erupting from the sun in the next decade. This event could potentially cause trillions of dollars’ worth of damage and take up to a decade to recover from.


Such an extreme event is considered to be relatively rare. The last gigantic solar storm, known as the Carrington Event, occurred more than 150 years ago and was the most powerful such event in recorded history.


That a rival to this event might have a greater than 10 percent chance of happening in the next 10 years was surprising to space physicist Pete Riley, senior scientist at Predictive Science in San Diego, California, who published the estimate in Space Weather on Feb. 23.


“Even if it’s off by a factor of two, that’s a much larger number than I thought,” he said.


Earth’s sun goes through an 11-year cycle of increased and decreased activity. During solar maximum, it’s dotted with many sunspots and enormous magnetic whirlwinds erupt from its surface. Occasionally, these flares burst outward from the sun, spewing a mass of charged particles out into space.



Small solar flares happen quite often whereas very large ones are infrequent, a mathematical distribution known as a power law. Riley was able to estimate the chance of an enormous solar flare by looking at historical databases and calculating the relation between the size and occurrence of solar flares.


The biggest solar event ever seen was the Carrington Event, which occurred on Sept. 1, 1859. That morning, astronomer Richard Carrington watched an enormous solar flare erupt from the sun’s surface, emitting a particle stream at the Earth traveling more than 4 million miles per hour.


When they hit the Earth’s atmosphere, those particles generated the intense ghostly ribbons of light known as auroras. Though typically relegated to the most northerly and southerly parts of the planet, the atmospheric phenomenon reached as far as Cuba, Hawaii, and northern Chile. People in New York City gathered on sidewalks and rooftops to watch “the heavens … arrayed in a drapery more gorgeous than they have been for years,” as The New York Times described it.


'It's like being able to see a cyclone coming but not knowing the wind speed until it hits your boat 50 miles off the coast.'
Auroras may be beautiful, but the charged particles can wreak havoc on electrical systems. At the time of the Carrington Event, telegraph stations caught on fire, their networks experienced major outages and magnetic observatories recorded disturbances in the Earth’s field that were literally off the scale.


In today’s electrically dependent modern world, a similar scale solar storm could have catastrophic consequences. Auroras damage electrical power grids and may contribute to the erosion of oil and gas pipelines. They can disrupt GPS satellites and disturb or even completely black out radio communication on Earth.


During a geomagnetic storm in 1989, for instance, Canada’s Hydro-Quebec power grid collapsed within 90 seconds, leaving millions without power for up to nine hours.


The potential collateral damage in the U.S. of a Carrington-type solar storm might be between $1 trillion and $2 trillion in the first year alone, with full recovery taking an estimated four to 10 years, according to a 2008 report from the National Research Council.


“A longer-term outage would likely include, for example, disruption of the transportation, communication, banking, and finance systems, and government services; the breakdown of the distribution of potable water owing to pump failure; and the loss of perishable foods and medications because of lack of refrigeration,” the NRC report said.


But such possibilities likely represent only the worst-case scenario, said Robert Rutledge, lead of the forecast office at the NOAA/National Weather Service Space Weather Prediction Center. The potential dangers might be significantly less, since power companies are aware of such problems and can take action to mitigate them.


For instance, companies may store power in areas where little damage is expected or bring on additional lines to help with power overloads. This is assuming, of course, that they are given enough warning as to the time and location of a solar storm’s impact on the Earth. Satellites relatively close to Earth are required to measure the exact strength and orientation of a storm.


“It’s like being able to see a cyclone coming but not knowing the wind speed until it hits your boat 50 miles off the coast,” Rutledge said.


Image: NASA

read more "1 in 8 Chance of Catastrophic Solar Megastorm by 2020"

Windows 8 Consumer Preview now available for download

Windows 8 Consumer Preview now available for download:
Don't say we didn't warn you. As anticipated, Leap Day is all about Microsoft in Barcelona, and Microsoft is all about you, the consumer. Redmond today officially unveiled the Consumer Preview of its forthcoming desktop operating system. Want to get an early look at the OS? Peep the source link below. Keep in mind: you'll need a 1GHz processor, either 1GB (32-bit) / 2 GB (64-bit) of RAM, 16GB (32-bit) / 20 GB (64-bit) available disk space, DirectX 9 graphics with WDDM 1.0 or higher and 1024 x 768 minimum screen resolution to run the new OS. Or, for the more faint of heart, check out our detailed preview and have a look at the press info after the break. The beta version of Windows Server "8" is available now as well for those who may be interested, via the TechNet link that follows.

[Thanks, all]

Continue reading Windows 8 Consumer Preview now available for download

Windows 8 Consumer Preview now available for download originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:42:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | sourceMicrosoft, TechNet | Email this | Comments
read more "Windows 8 Consumer Preview now available for download"

Air Force Chief: What Would Bombing Iran Do, Exactly?

Air Force Chief: What Would Bombing Iran Do, Exactly?:

A B-2 Spirit bomber waits on the runway of Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo. Photo: U.S. Air Force


If the U.S. ever bombs Iran’s nuclear facilities, it’ll be Gen. Norton Schwartz’s planes and pilots that pull off the attack. So the Air Force chief of staff wants someone to explain what the hell the military objective of bombing Iran will actually be.


“Everything we have to do has to have an objective,” Schwartz told reporters at a breakfast meeting Wednesday. “What is the objective? Is it to eliminate [Iran's nuclear program]? Is it to delay? Is it to complicate? What is the national security objective?”


“There’s a tendency for all of us to go tactical too quickly, and worry about weaponeering and things of that nature,” Schwartz continued. “Iran bears watching” is about as far as the top Air Force officer was willing to go.


It also sounded like Schwartz had thought carefully about what a bombing campaign aimed at suspected Iranian nuclear facilities would actually look like. “Our obligation is to provide the President and the civilian leadership options,” Schwartz said. “We have done that. And there are others in the government who have provided non-military options — financial, diplomatic, informational and so on.”


“I am comfortable that [Gen.] Jim Mattis” — the commander of U.S. troops in the Middle East and South Asia — “is satisfied that we have been as forthcoming and imaginative as possible, from our perch,” Schwartz said.



It’s a delicate time for Schwartz to slam on the brakes of a potential war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will visit President Obama at the White House on Friday. He’s unhappy with another U.S. general, Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for saying last week that bombing Iran was “not prudent.”


The Obama administration does not appear to want open war. (Kidnapping Iranian scientists, wrecking Tehran’s nuclear supply chain or introducing worms into its centrifuge control systems are another story, as are economic sanctions.) The past week has seen lots of high-profile leaks tamping down the case for an attack, including doubts from within the U.S. spy apparatus that Iran is actually working on a bomb and the likelihood of Iranian reprisal attacks inflaming the region and prompting terrorist attacks on U.S. interests and assets.


But those aren’t considerations about what military action could even achieve. Schwartz boosted the Air Force’s ability to blow up targets buried underground, as Iran’s most sensitive nuclear facilities are believed to be — “You wouldn’t want to be there if we used it,” he said — but only up to a point.


“It goes without saying that strike is about physics,” Schwartz said, “and the deeper you go the harder it gets.”

read more "Air Force Chief: What Would Bombing Iran Do, Exactly?"

Silicon, Solar Power & Manufacturing: China Continues to Play By Its Own Rules, Threatening All Comers

Silicon, Solar Power & Manufacturing: China Continues to Play By Its Own Rules, Threatening All Comers:

Graphic courtesy Washington Post

Much has been talked and written about competition when it comes to manufacturing and international trade in solar photovoltaic (PV) products and technology in the wake of CASM’s filing of dumping and countervailing duty petitions with the Dept. of Commerce and International Trade Commission. Talking about the competitiveness, or lack thereof, of manufacturing solar PV in the US isn’t anywhere near central to the real issue, however. This becomes apparent when examining the vastly different, fundamental nature and structure of the Chinese and US economies.


Talking about relative competitiveness of manufacturing in China versus the US is valid enough in theory, but in fact the US and China are playing completely different ball games, or more accurately, playing the same ball game according to wildly different rules. Nowhere can this fundamental clash of economic systems and government policies be seen than in the solar PV industry policies and goals set out in China’s latest, recently announced Five-Year Plan.


China’s 12th Five-Year Plan: A Clear, Present Threat to Foreign Competitors


Part of China’s 12th Five-Year Plan, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced the admirable and welcome goal of reducing the cost of solar power to 0.8 yuan (12 US cents) per kilowatt-hour (kWh) by 2015 and 0.6 yuan (9 cents) by 2020.


The 12th Five-Year Plan also calls for Chinese manufacturers to significantly increase production of solar PV panels to reach 5 gigawatts (5 GW) by 2015, while polysilicon producers will increase their annual production capacity to 50,000 tons.


These market directives come in the wake of solar PV panel prices having crashed in the past two years. Leading solar PV companies around the world are posting losses, while less well-established businesses are going bankrupt. Uncalled for, unsustainable growth in solar PV panel and polysilicon production by Chinese producers have been the main culprits.


Ironically, the extraordinary drop in solar PV and polysilicon prices largely prompted by increasing Chinese production is leading governments in the countries that have lead growth in solar power to cut back and reduce, if not eliminate or shelve, subsidies and other incentives– killing the goose that lays the golden eggs, so to speak.


Flaunting International Trade Rules


Is China’s latest Five-Year Plan the response of an open market-driven economy driven by supply and demand? Clearly not. It’s the response of a centralized command-and-control economic system that is fundamentally the polar opposite of those in the US and other major market-driven economies around the world. To pretend otherwise risks future economic growth and well-being of citizens in the US, EU and all other Chinese trade partners.


Regardless of market supply and demand conditions, the Chinese government is intent on continual expansion of “private sector” solar power companies across the supply chain. Could the following ever occur in the US, EU or other countries based on a private sector, market-driven economy?


“The government will also help companies in the solar sector increase annual sales. It aims to have at least one company reaching 100 billion yuan in sales by 2015, and between three and five companies reaching 50 billion yuan by the same date,” according to People’s Daily Online’s report.


Not only that, but despite announced plans to aggressively ramp up domestic solar PV installations, well over 90% of China’s solar PV cells and panels are exported. Hence, the solar power goals laid out in China’s latest Five-Year Plan only raise the stakes and increase the pressure on competitors in other WTO member countries.


Subsidizing industries to increase exports to the detriment and harm of industry and businesses in other WTO member countries is specifically prohibited according to WTO rules. So is dumping of products at costs below domestic production. Seeking to enforce these international trade rules to assure something like a level playing field is what CASM’s trade petitions are all about.


Thus far, China’s industrial development and trade policies have focused on knocking out foreign competition in silicon solar PV. The latest Five-Year Plan expands that and puts thin-film solar PV manufacturers under threat. “The plan will bring opportunities for thin-film PV panels,” People’s Daily quoted a unnamed source at Hanergy Holdings Group Co Ltd, a producer of thin-film PV panels.

read more "Silicon, Solar Power & Manufacturing: China Continues to Play By Its Own Rules, Threatening All Comers"

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

How NASCAR Took Over Twitter

How NASCAR Took Over Twitter:

Greg Biffle, Dale Earnahdrt Jr, Landon Cassill and Joey Logano (from left) wait for Brad Keselowski as they walk down the track toward the fire that brought the NASCAR Daytona 500 to a halt. Photo: Bill Friel/Associated Press


By Matt Hardigree, Jalopnik


America’s wonkiest social media platform, Twitter, and its (supposedly) most backward sport, NASCAR, exploded in a massive fireball fueled by jet fuel, secret phones and good timing last night during the Daytona 500. It’s the story of how one driver picked up 100,000 followers in two hours and how the sport of good ol’ boys may be forever changed.


To the uninformed, NASCAR may seem like the last place a technology like Twitter — created by and for and the kind of hip techies who know which breakfast taco places have free wifi during SXSW — might thrive. To these people, NASCAR is just a bunch of guys driving in a circle.


jalopnik
But NASCAR, like baseball, grows more interesting with context. It’s an epic soap opera, and fans thrive on information. Who’s pitting? How’s their car doing? What’s the track condition? Such things are the currency of NASCAR fans on race day. Although they may not be among the most tech-savvy fans, they may be the most voracious consumers of info outside the Fantasy Baseball crowd. Just look at their apps.


Most drivers have Twitter accounts, and savvy fans flock to knowledgeable reporters like SBNation’s Jeff Gluck and AP reporter Jenna Fryer, both of whom have more than 20K followers. (How many AP reporters can say that?) Fox Sports’ NASCAR anchor Mike Joy has more than 16,000 followers. There’s an unofficial NASCAR weatherman and a page for the unlucky Jet Drier that (usually) keeps the track dry.


So fans clearly use Twitter a lot. But something special happened last night that merged the technology to the sport in ways almost certain to be permanent.


Well, as permanent as anything can be when it comes to technology.



Emergency workers battle a fire after Juan Pablo Montoya's car hit a jet drier truck during the NASCAR Daytona 500. Photo: Bill Friel/Associated Press


The Daytona 500 is the first race of the year, which makes it a Very Big Deal. But it also was Danica Patrick’s debut in NASCAR’s top series, which also is a big deal.


The race was slated for Sunday, but an an untimely rain delay pushed it Monday night. Fox, seeing a potential bonanza, preempted an episode of House no one cared about and an episode of Alcatraz no one would watch to show the race in prime time.


This expanded the audience to include a lot of people who wouldn’t have otherwise watched the race. They weren’t disappointed. The first crash came just two laps in when Patrick got mixed up in a pile-up.


It was the first of ten cautions, none of which could match the (literally) explosive power of Juan Pablo Montoya crashing into a jet drier clearing the track of debris. The impact, which happened under caution, ignited 200 gallons of jet fuel, creating a giant fireball and a river of flame. It brought the race to a halt.


Unplanned TV often is the best TV. Montoya walked away from his mangled car, no one was seriously injured and the video made for riveting television. Explosions are inherently sexy and tap a deep part of our subconscious. Just ask Michael Bay. Preliminary reports show the race’s ratings climbed from 7.8 to 8.8 after the accident, possibly giving Fox its highest-rated Monday night since the World Series.


And there we were, all of us watching men fight a river of fire when something even weirder happened: Popular NASCAR driver Brad Keselowski pulled a phone from his pocket, snapped a pic from inside his car and posted it to Twitter.



Most people never suspected a NASCAR driver circling a track at 200 mph might have a phone in his pocket. So of course it set off a Twitter storm, immediately giving us direct access to the thoughts of a driver even as commentators were prattling on about the weirdest thing they’d ever seen in racing. It was far more immediate, and intimate, than listening to a driver’s radio.


A sampling:



As the wait went on:



It was, as far as I can tell, unprecedented in modern racing. Keselowski was funny, charming, informative and interactive. In other words, he was a perfect spokesman for everything that’s great about Twitter.


And for those who wonder, NASCAR has no problem with Keselowski’s tweets:



Because it’s the NASCAR Sprint Cup, there’s already a push from Fox to get people to follower commentators, reporters and everyone else on Twitter. Last night it went into overdrive. The fire became less important as everyone was talking about Twitter. Keselowski picked up 100,000 followers while tweeting from the track. He was up to 211,265 by mid-day today.


I’ve asked Twitter for the full numbers, but I suspect we’ll find those new followers weren’t simply NASCAR fans who weren’t already following Keselowski — already one of the most popular drivers on Twitter. I think we’ll find two groups added to Keselowski’s impressive number:


The first is NASCAR fans joining Twitter to find out what was going on and get in on a social media platform they’ve only now come to understand the significance of.


The second is casual racing fans or non-fans who, watching the strange spectacle unfold, started following Keselowski just to get in on the excitement. That’s why I started following him.


Of course, the fire brought the race to a halt, and eventually drivers started getting out of their cars. Then they started talking. And what did they talk about?


Twitter.


Dave Blaney, who found himself in first place as the bizarre scene unfolded on the track, became a trending topic. Blaney, who had never won a race despite 397 race starts, was being asked whether he was on Twitter, not what he thought about being one thunderstorm away from winning one of the world’s biggest races.


And the memes! Oh the memes. So many memes. The guys at @SpeedSportLife — who typically tweet the entire 24 Hours of Le Mans but rarely a three-hour NASCAR race — were madly tweeting images by our own commenters before we even noticed.


If you were watching the race but you weren’t on Twitter, you were missing the latest info, best jokes and most insightful views of one of the wildest races ever. The race eventually restarted, Keselowski put his phone back in his pocket and a guy no one knows (Blaney) lost the race to Matt Kenseth, a guy who’d won it before.


Who won ultimately doesn’t matter. The outcome was more than a victory for one driver or one team. It was a victory for NASCAR. The 2012 Daytona 500 was the merging of two cultures, a union that, in retrospect, was inevitable.


NASCAR relies on short, timely bursts of information, which is exactly what Twitter does best. The rest of us just figured it out.

read more "How NASCAR Took Over Twitter"

747-8 VIP


VIP customers, usually from the Middle East, are traditionally coy about whether they even own vast aircraft like a 747, let alone what the interiors may look like.
Today Boeing officially delivered the first non-freighter version of the stretched 747-8 to a VIP customer and, although they’re not confirming it is bound for Qatar, the manufacturer is at least revealing images of what the interior could eventually look like.


blog post photo
First 747-8 VIP for customer delivery takes the runway at Everett (Joe Walker)

It’s unlikely that any shots of the real thing will emerge and even if they do, don’t hold your breath – the completion project will take at least two years from now. First the 747-8 flies to Wichita, Kansas where Boeing Global Transport & Executive Systems will install an Aeroloft – a grand, 393 sq ft version of the upper aft fuselage crew rest modification developed by Greenpoint Technologies.
Then, sometime in April – roughly around the time Lufthansa is expected to take its first passenger version – the VIP model will also fly to Germany for the start of the major completion process at Lufthansa Technik’s Hamburg site. Here’s a selection of interior concepts – some of which could form the basis for the conversion that’s about to transform this 747-8 into a flying palace.

blog post photo
Lufthansa Technik


blog post photo
Lufthansa Technik


blog post photo
Greenpoint Technologies


blog post photo
Lufthansa Technik

...and finally, the staff seating area with (presumably) stair access to the Aeroloft.

blog post photo
Greenpoint Technologies

from Things With Wings 
read more "747-8 VIP"

Python PIC useful when attached to a computer

Python PIC useful when attached to a computer:


[Richard] sent in a link to the Python controlled microcontroller he’s been working on. Unlike the previous portable Python boards we’ve seen, [Richard] thinks his pyMCU isn’t best used autonomously. This board is meant to be used only when connected to a computer and to serve as a bridge between the digital world of computers and our analog world.


We’ve seen boards running lightweight Python interpreters, but we’re fairly intrigued by the idea of this board only being useful when plugged into a computer. The on-board PIC 16F chip has enough digital, analog and PWM pins to just about any task imaginable, and there’s also a 16-pin LCD display header if you’d like some output with your microcontrollers.


[Richard] says he’s been working with PICs for longer than the Arduino is around, but depending on the level of interest he’ll consider developing an Arduino version of the pyMCU. All we know is that the pyMCU would be awesome to teach electronics and programming to the younglings, and we could certainly find a few more uses for the board when they’re done with it.


read more "Python PIC useful when attached to a computer"
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...